Somalia’s Attorney General Ahmed Dahir put up a spirited case at the International Court of Justice against Kenya’s attempts to discredit a border row case it has petitioned the court to resolve.
Kenya’s Attorney General Githu Muigai slammed Somalis as ‘ingrates’, accusing them of reneging on a 2009 MoU to resolve the border row out of court and termed the case ‘without merit’. However, Somalia insists Kenya is not interested in any out of court settlement and is using the presence her military in Somalia pursuing the Al Shabaab to continue staking the maritime area.
Kenya and Somalia are disputing their maritime boundaries including the continental shelf beyond 200 nautical miles in the Indian Ocean.
Dahir said Kenya is “hiding behind favours it apparently did for Somalia long ago”.
Muigai last Thursday criticised Somalia’s decision to sue Kenya over the oil-rich ocean, saying it shows the country is not appreciative of the “exceptional sacrifices” made on its behalf.
Muigai said the two countries had in 2009 signed an MoU agreeing to settle the boundary issue out of court. Dahir accused the Kenyan government of dishonesty.
He said: “This shows the length to which Kenya would go and the significant resources that it will devote to accomplish one objective: to make sure that the court does not hear the case.”
He said: “Kenya wants to maintain the untenable status quo and evade its responsibility to seek peaceful settlement of this complex maritime dispute between the two countries.”
Muigai said the ICJ does not have jurisdiction to hear the case
. Somalia launched the maritime case at the ICJ last year on August 28. Dahir said his government will reject Kenya’s attempts to “deny us justice”.
“Our government believes in the strength of its legal case,” he said.
Source: Kenya Today
